Meter Probe Offset Null Does Not Zero

Forum for discussing PicoScope (version 5)
Post Reply
GalenEvans
User
User
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA

Meter Probe Offset Null Does Not Zero

Post by GalenEvans »

Hello,

I cannot get the Meter window to correctly apply the null offset to the displayed value in the latest version.

I am using PicoScope 5.13.1 (downloaded 2 days ago) with an ADC216. When I display a meter in 10 mV, 20mV, 50 mV, or 100 mV ranges, the meter window reads -0.546mV on channel A and +0.196 mV DC on channel B AFTER a null offset is performed - while the inputs are still shorted.

The equivilent DC measure functions on the Scope window go to zero (well, actually 0.0002 mV which is close enough!) after a null offset. So, I know the hardware is actually able to see and measure zero. The measure functions on the scope screen are always within 0.05% F.S. of my calibrator after a null offset, but the meter will always be off by about -0.546mV on channel A and +0.196mV on channel B. So, the offset is staying in the displayed meter measurements.

I have tried selecting Null Offset with meter window active and with scope window active. No difference. I tried both auto-scale and manually selecting scales for the meter and for the scope. No difference. I tried each channel. No difference. I also tried using 2 different shorts constructed of different materials, and the null volts function on a calibrator in case the issue was thermal EMF. No difference. I also tried rebooting the computer (a Compaq laptop running Windows ME). No difference.

I am connected to the ADC216 through the parallel port with no other devices attached. The only software loaded after boot-up is PicoScope.

Can you investigate?

Thanks,
Galen

Sarah

Post by Sarah »

Hi

Thank you for your post.

I will pass this on to our software department to look into, it may be that there is a bug in the latest version.

If you wish to roll-back to a previous version you can get one from:

http://www.picotech.com/software-archive.html

Best Regards

GalenEvans
User
User
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA

Post by GalenEvans »

Thanks Sarah.

BTW, I think your marketing group should consider revising the accuracy specifications of the ADC 216. It consistently measures much better than the advertised 1%; actually it is better .25% F.S. except in the 10 and 20mV scales where it is about 0.25% F.S +/- 0.5 mV.

If your specs were in line with the unit's actual performance and there were a published verification protocol (and/or calibration procedure!), it could be sold as a standard for field calibration of sensors. We've been using it for that purpose and it is way better than toting around a "portable oscilloscope." However, we had to verify performance on a precision calibrator before and after every use for months before the quality auditor would accept that it actually is much better than specified.

Thanks again,
Galen

Guest

Post by Guest »

Hi!

I have exactly the same problem with my ADC-216.

I have tried the latest and several older software versions and all the things that GalenEvans mentions in his post.

My question is: Is this how it should be on the ADC-216 or has there been any kind of fix to this problem?

I'd also like to know if Pico offers any kind of calibration or update service for the ADC-216.

Many thanks for your reply!

Robin
Advanced User
Advanced User
Posts: 558
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:17 am

Post by Robin »

Hi

What value do you get on the meter after performing the offset null?

We do offer calibration. Email support@picotech.com if you wish to arrange this.

Robin

Post Reply