Test and Measurement Forum

Compatible Linux Versions?

Post general discussions on using our drivers to write your own software here

Compatible Linux Versions?

Postby sartory » Thu Apr 10, 2003 12:39 am

I am trying to install the parallel port linux drivers for an ADC100. I've tried several versions of linux, but get a series of errors running MAKE. Probably there is no significant problem, but I don't know enough to interpret the error messages.

The PicoTech literature mentions RedHat6.0. That's quite old. Are there any other versions of linux for which the drivers are known to compile & install without errors?

If I buy an old copy of RedHat6.0 on ebay, can I then be assured of being able to MAKE & install the drivers error-free?



Postby matthew » Thu Apr 10, 2003 10:01 am

Hi Walt,

Although, I can get the application to compile on linux kernel 2.4 (I think its Redhat 6). I can't get the ADC-100 to take any readings.

Since we're not in a position to support the Linux drivers in a timely fashion (see the notice on the linux download page), I would advise against persuing the Linux path at this time.

The windows 32-bit drivers are fully supported.

Best Regards,
Matt Everett

Pico Software Engineer
User avatar
Advanced User
Advanced User
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 9:35 am
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Red Hat compatibility

Postby jrhunt » Sat May 17, 2003 12:00 pm

I was able to compile the ADC42 driver under RH7.2, so probably no need to go back as far as RH6.
Cannot compile under RH8.0, which is a shame because I had written a nice little Perl app to log data to file at regular intervals.
Using Windows is not an option for me - this is a Microsoft free zone.

Compilation fails - possible cause

Postby jrhunt » Sat May 17, 2003 1:10 pm

It looks to me (but I am not an expert in this) as if reason for compile fail is missing /usr/include/asm/delay.h and others.
Up to RH7.2 (and 7.3?) these were in the kernel-headers rpm. That rpm no longer exists. I don't know where these files are in RH8. They are NOT in any rpm in any of the 3 install CDs. If they exist at all they are in an rpm on one of the source CDs, that I don't have copies of.

Compilation fails - Correction

Postby jrhunt » Sun May 18, 2003 10:20 am

No, its not that simple.
By trial and error, changing the includes in picolnx.c to
#include <linux/time.h> // added
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <asm/segment.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
//#include <asm/uaccess.h> // removed
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/tqueue.h>
//#include <linux/delay.h> // removed

reduces number of compile errors reported. Sorry, I don't have the time to investigate further. I'm sure someone who is expert at compiling C could fix this quickly.

Wrong makefile

Postby tomset » Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:09 pm

The makefile was wrong, corrected:

INCLUDEDIR = /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include

targets: pico.o ddtest a10test a11test a100test

pico.o: picolnx.o drdaqscl.o

ld -r -o pico.o picolnx.o drdaqscl.o

picolnx.o: picolnx.c

gcc -O -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -o picolnx.o -c picolnx.c

drdaqscl.o: drdaqscl.c

gcc -O -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -o drdaqscl.o -c drdaqscl.c

ddtest: ddtest.c pico_lnx.h

gcc -D LINUX -o ddtest ddtest.c

a11test: a11test.c pico_lnx.h

gcc -o a11test a11test.c

a10test: a10test.c pico_lnx.h

gcc -o a10test a10test.c

a100test: a100test.c pico_lnx.h

gcc -o a100test a100test.c

Linux makefile needs a fix

Postby Guest » Thu Sep 25, 2003 4:03 pm

This post applies to the picopar.tar Linux module distribution.

To get it to make, the line

gcc -O -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -o picolnx.o -c picolnx.c

needs to be changed to point to the correct kernel include files, which in my case are at /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/include:

gcc -O -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/include -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -o picolnx.o -c picolnx.c

A more complete fix was posted by tomset, but that was months ago, and the makefile still hasn't been patched.

When you load the module, you get:

[root@flasher picopar]# insmod ./pico.o
Warning: loading ./pico.o will taint the kernel: no license
See http://www.tux.org/lkml/#export-tainted for information about tainted modules
Module pico loaded, with warnings

Reviewing the code, I wonder why Pico doesn't GPL or OSS this stuff.

I lack the hardware for the moment, but it builds and loads with RH9, Linux 2.4.22, so this looks pretty good.

Return to General Software Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests