Any update from development yet?

I'm glad it can be reproduced at least. Let me know if you can when it might be fixed and I'll test it.

Still does it with 6.12.9 as well... settings file enclosed.

Also, it doesn't see the glitch itself easily, so connect the output of the 2205A to a higher bandwidth/different clock domain scope to see if you can reproduce it.

Will test tonight with this version, didn't know a new one was out. Is there a change log or what's new for this version?

I can get this tonight, but there is nothing special about it. Turn on the AWG, select triangle, I think it was 800mV amplitude. The issue was viewed on an analog scope and also a 2207B. Can you try to repeat this test with a 2205A to see if you can reproduce it?

I noticed that there is a glitch when looking at a triangle wave on a 2205A:

See this picture:

http://home.earthlink.net/~alank2/2205a.png

In this case it is happening at zero. I confirmed this by looking at it on an analog scope as well. My 2207B AWG does NOT do this.

Any ideas?

They get better and better as the price goes up, but most things are like that. My favorite sweet spot picks are: 2205A without probes - I wouldn't go less than this, you get 200 MSa/s and 25 MHz which isn't too bad for most projects. 2206B is better as it has 500 MSa/s, 50 MHz, but more importantly...

I ordered a 2207B so we'll see how I like it when i shows up!

Looking at two different models: 2206B vs 2208A: 50MHz/500MSa/32M of sample memory vs. 200MHz/1GSa/48k of sample memory. Besides the obvious difference in bandwidth/sample rate, my question is what will be the effective difference in the picoscope software for the 32M vs 48k sample memory? I know th...