Search found 3 matches

by Hannoh
Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:55 am
Forum: Linux
Topic: Linux Drivers
Replies: 15
Views: 47008

I second Jeff. Even if I can have the source under an NDA with some way to be able to distribute it with a picoscope and an embedded system I would still consider it. Open source would however be 1st price. Then I do not have to worry about distribution and I would be able to compile for new/next ge...
by Hannoh
Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:50 am
Forum: Linux
Topic: Gumstix + pico
Replies: 2
Views: 4615

I do not think it will work on an ARM processor as the driver is only available in binary format compiled for the i386 (intel x86). I would also like to use a gumstix board (Overo) but without the source code I can not compile for the ARM architecture and the supplied drivers are useless for my proj...
by Hannoh
Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:45 am
Forum: Linux
Topic: Sources of driver
Replies: 8
Views: 9729

sources for drivers

There is a lot of small ARM based CPU boards being released. Not having the driver in source format do limit the use of Pico scopes in these products. These CPUs is nowadays very capable of doing basic processing of captured signals and control based on these inputs. If you do not release the code c...