Thanks a bunch, up and running now.
Some buggy behaviour though, will give feedback later.
Search found 38 matches
- Sat Mar 16, 2019 6:33 pm
- Forum: PicoScope for Mac
- Topic: OSX Sierra compatibility with 6.11.13.2
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12076
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:40 pm
- Forum: USB PC Oscilloscopes
- Topic: PicoScope calibration
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2811
Re: PicoScope calibration
I might add that if possible I would like adjustments to get as accurate performance as possible, not just a measurement check-up.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:37 pm
- Forum: USB PC Oscilloscopes
- Topic: PicoScope calibration
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2811
Re: PicoScope calibration
For service calibration of a Picoscope 4562, are we talking about a return to UK or do you have approved partners around Europe?
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:30 pm
- Forum: PicoScope for Mac
- Topic: OSX Sierra compatibility with 6.11.13.2
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12076
Re: OSX Sierra compatibility with 6.11.13.2
I'm on Sierra (10.12.6) and Picolog works like a charm. When I install Picoscope everything seems fine but when I click on the icon in the app folder the only thing that is happening is the Pico icon jumping up and down in the dock but the software does not open up and start. Mac OS reports that Pic...
- Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:13 am
- Forum: USB PC Oscilloscopes
- Topic: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4709
Re: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
Thanks Gerry! Sorry for bad wording regarding aliasing and "imaging". I do realize the difference between sampling signals above Nyquist that folds down below Nyquist (aka aliasing) and sampling signals below Nyquist but trying to reproduce them without a lowpass reconstruction filter (aka "brickwal...
- Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:01 pm
- Forum: USB PC Oscilloscopes
- Topic: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4709
Re: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
Hi! Please see attached files. One FFT to show quality of signal generator (Agilent DSOX-3032) stimuli at 1MHz (=low distortion) and three scope views of three different sines below 5MHz. It seems like what we can see is just what you would see on the output of a poorly filtered DAC giving mirror si...
- Tue Mar 29, 2016 4:57 pm
- Forum: USB PC Oscilloscopes
- Topic: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4709
Re: Performance of Picoscope 4262 does not reach expectation
Regarding performance expectations of 4262, are there any known aliasing problems with this scope? I can not get clean results above approx 1MHz no matter if linear or sin(x)/x interpolation is used. This does not go well with the advertised bandwith of 5MHz. Feeding a clean sine (harmonics/spurious...
- Sun Apr 26, 2015 1:00 pm
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: PicoScope 6.10.8: Log frequency axis
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13074
Re: PicoScope 6.10.8: Log frequency axis
Hi! I was happy to learn that the latest Picoscope 6 allows for the analog hardware lowpass filter at 200kHz to be used as well as the log axis for frequency in spectrum mode. I was less happy to learn that on two installations on two different machines Pico 6.10.16 gives very sluggish response when...
- Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:58 pm
- Forum: PicoLog
- Topic: 4000 series and PicoLog
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9224
Re: 4000 series and PicoLog
I would love to be able to use my Picoscope 4262 with Picolog.
I assume I should not hold my breath?
I assume I should not hold my breath?

- Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:47 pm
- Forum: PicoScope for Mac
- Topic: PicoScope 6 Beta Release for Mac OSX
- Replies: 17
- Views: 17826
Re: PicoScope 6 Beta Release for Mac OSX
Hi I'm on Mac OSX 10.6.8 on my everyday machine and have no plans "downgrading" to a more recent OS. It's not possible to install Mono on the older OS 10.6.8 which means I'm out of luck using Pico on my Mac without re-booting to my bootcamp Windows installation. Will this always be the case or can I...
- Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:52 pm
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: PicoScope 6.10.8: Log frequency axis
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13074
Re: PicoScope Beta 6.10.2: Log frequency axis
Really great that you got this in place. What I miss though in this Beta is the 200kHz hardware filter setting for 4262. Hope you get that back soon. It's also missing in the latest version. R6.9.14. but is there in R6.6.57. Also it would be nice with better control of Y axis scaling in spectrum mod...
- Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:56 am
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: Error reading THD+N
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5119
Re: Error reading THD+N
Thanks for reply. This scope seems very nice for general audio work but proper distortion analyzis feels essential. I use to use a high quality pro sound card but also a scope (3224) for analyzis. With 4262 it seems you can get by with one unit only but proper software functions is important. I also...
- Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:48 am
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: log-scale?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13350
Re: log-scale?
Hi!
Thanks for reply. It makes sense to have good functions for audio analyzis with this scope.
Thanks for reply. It makes sense to have good functions for audio analyzis with this scope.
- Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:35 pm
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: The AWG issue of PicoScope5204 on PicoScope R6.6.18
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6147
Re: The AWG issue of PicoScope5204 on PicoScope R6.6.18
I was trying to read up on the performance of the signal generator of 4262 since that built in generator is one of the reasons I'm considering this scope. It's not clear to me what kind of performane to expect since the manual is not very informative in this regard. It says DC-20kHz and sine, square...
- Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:58 pm
- Forum: PicoScope 6 for Windows
- Topic: log-scale?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13350
Re: log-scale?
Hello I was surprised back when I purchased a 3224 that there was no log option. I'm about to equip a new workstation and looking at a 4262 for audio analysis and I'm even more surprised that this has not been implemented yet six years later. Can you confirm that you will implement this and if so wh...