For many engineers, choosing a new oscilloscope can be daunting—there are hundreds of different models to choose from with widely varying costs and specifications. This article guides you through the maze of considerations and will hopefully help you avoid making what could prove to be an expensive mistake.
The first step in choosing an oscilloscope is not to look at adverts or scope specifications, rather it is to invest some time thinking about what you will use it for and where.
Armed with the above knowledge, you can begin to consider what oscilloscope will be best for your applications.
The focus of this article is on Digital Storage Oscilloscopes (DSOs) as they represent the majority of new oscilloscopes purchased today. Before describing what to look for in an digital oscilloscope, it is necessary to begin by at least touching on analog.
Most electronics engineers will have used an analog scope at some time and will be familiar with its layout and operation. In fact, many people purchasing oscilloscopes today are replacing analog with digital.
Although there are still some engineers who love the look and feel (let alone the warmth) of analog scopes, they have few, if any, features that cannot be surpassed by a DSO.
If you are still tempted by an analog scope you will find your choice limited. Only a few manufacturers still make analog scopes; some of the models still on sale are based on rather old technology and often have very limited performance.
Buying a second hand analog scope may initially seem like good economic sense but, before doing so, check for the availability of spares, as high repair costs can make the purchase a false economy.
There are other criteria that have added weight to the analogue vs digital debate. DSOs:
Modern DSOs, with their PC connectivity, can also be fully integrated into Automatic Test Equipment (ATE) systems. In addition, the DSO is often used as the front–end of a high speed data acquisition system, making the cost per channel much more economically viable.
The first feature to consider is bandwidth. This can be defined as the maximum frequency of signal that can pass through the front-end amplifiers. It therefore follows that the analogue bandwidth of your scope must be higher than the maximum frequency that you wish to measure (real time).
Bandwidth alone is not enough to ensure that a DSO can accurately capture a high frequency signal. The goal of scope manufacturers is to achieve a specific type of frequency response with their designs. This response is known as the Maximally Flat Envelope Delay (MFED). A frequency response of this type delivers excellent pulse fidelity with minimum overshoot, undershoot and ringing. However, since a DSO is composed of amplifiers, attenuators, ADCs, interconnects, and relays, MFED response is a goal that can only be approached, and never met completely.
It is worth noting that most scope manufacturers define the bandwidth as the frequency at which a sine wave input signal will be attenuated to 71% of its true amplitude (–3 dB point). Or, to put it another way, they allow the displayed trace to be 29% in error of the input before calling it a day.
Remember also that, if your input signal is not a pure sine wave, it will contain higher frequency harmonics. For example, a 20 MHz pure square wave viewed on a 20 MHz bandwidth scope will be displayed as an attenuated and distorted waveform. As a rule of thumb, try to purchase a scope with a bandwidth five times higher than the maximum frequency signal you wish to measure. Unfortunately, high bandwidth scopes are expensive, so you may have to compromise here.
On some scopes, the quoted bandwidth is not available on all voltage ranges, so check the data sheet carefully.
With analog scopes life was simple: you just selected the bandwidth that you required. For digital scopes, sampling rate and memory depth are equally important. For DSOs, the sampling rate is usually specified in mega samples per second (MS/s) or gigasamples per second (GS/s). The Nyquist criterion states that the sampling rate must be at least twice the maximum frequency that you want to measure: for a spectrum analyser this may be true, but for a scope you require at least 5 samples to accurately reconstruct a waveform.
Most scopes have two different sampling rates (modes) depending on the signal being measured: real-time and equivalent-time sampling (ETS)—often called repetitive sampling. However, ETS only works if the signal you are measuring is stable and repetitive, since this mode works by building up the waveform from successive acquisitions.
For example the Pico Technology 12-bit ADC-212/100 will sample at 100 MS/s real-time or, for repetitive waveforms, at 5 GS/s. Figure 1a shows a 20 MHz square wave captured with a sampling rate of 50 MS/s—almost unrecognisable compared to Figure 1b, the same wave captured at 5 GS/s. Now, 5 GS/s sounds great, but remember that if the signal is a transient or changing (say a video waveform) then ETS will not work and you will have to rely on the real time (single shot) bandwidth, which is typically much lower.
A word of advice: scope manufacturers like to highlight the best sounding specification, so you may need to look carefully at the specifications to work out if a quoted sampling rate applies to all signals, or to only repetitive ones. You may find that the scope you are planning to purchase is not ‘fit for purpose’.
Some scopes have different sampling rates, depending on the number of channels in use. Typically, the sampling rate in single channel mode is twice that in dual channel mode: once again, check the specifications.
Memory depth is perhaps the least understood aspect of a DSO which is a shame because it is one of the most important.
DSOs store captured samples in a buffer memory, so, for a given sampling rate, the size of the buffer memory determines how long it can capture a signal for before the memory is full.
The relationship between sampling rate and memory depth is important; a scope with a high sampling rate but small memory will only be able to use its full sampling rate on the top few timebases. Figure 2a shows 200 µs of a video waveform captured using 1 k of buffer memory. The 1 k buffer memory limits the sampling rate to 5 MS/s (1 k / 200 µs) even though the scope is capable of sampling at 100 MS/s.
At first glance, this seems to have captured the waveform satisfactorily. However, the limitation of the small buffer memory is revealed when the waveform is expanded to ‘zoom in’ on the colour burst signal (Figure 2b). The colour burst (oscillations at the base of the ‘steps’) lasts about 5 µs so is only represented by 25 points in memory fine for normal view but, when we zoom in, those few points are used to fill the screen.
Figure 2c shows the same colour burst section of the video waveform but this time captured on a scope with a 128 kB buffer memory. We have more than 3000 points available to represent the colour burst section and the difference is noticeable.
To make sense of the relationship between bandwidth, sampling rate and memory depth, it makes sense to consider a real world example. Consider trying to capture one frame of USB (1.1) data. A frame of data lasts 1 ms and has serial data transmitted at 12 Mbps. To simplify our analysis, we can assume that we have to capture a 12 MHz square wave for 1 ms.
In digital electronics, a signal change of 1% is usually no problem, but in audio electronics, 0.1% distortion or noise can be a disaster. Most modern DSOs are optimised for use with fast digital signals and only offer 8 bit resolution (8 bit ADC), so can detect at best a 0.4% signal change (see table).
With 8 bits, the voltage range is divided up into 256 vertical steps (28 = 256). With a ±1 V range selected, this corresponds to around 8 mV per step. This may be adequate for viewing digital signals but leave something to be desired for viewing analog signals, especially when using the spectrum analyser function (if it has one).
For applications such as audio, noise, vibration and monitoring sensors (temperature, current, pressure) an 8 bit oscilloscope is often not suitable and you should consider 12 or 16 bit alternatives.
As for a DSO’s accuracy, it is not usually regarded as too important. You can make measurements within a few percent (most 8 bit DSOs quote 3% to 5% DC accuracy) but for more accurate measurements you should reach for a multimeter.
With a higher resolution oscilloscope, more accurate measurements are possible (1% or better) so no need for the meter!
Oscilloscopes with both a high resolution (12 bits or more) and a high DC accuracy are sometimes referred to as precision oscilloscopes — see our application note on high resolution oscilloscopes and FFT spectrum analyser.
A scope’s trigger function synchronises the horizontal sweep at the correct point of its signal: this is essential for clear signal characterisation. Trigger controls allow you to stabilise repetitive waveforms and capture single-shot waveforms. Depending on the type of signals being investigated, it is worth looking at the trigger options offered by a manufacturer. All digital scopes offer the same basic trigger options (source, level, slope, pre/post trigger) but differ in the more advanced trigger functions. Whether or not the more advanced trigger functions will be useful again depends on the signals being measured. Pulse triggers are useful for digital signals, and an automatic save to disk/memory option can be a great help when tracking down intermittent faults.
Some application specific triggers (disk drive testing, for example) are often available as cost extras and are installed as a software or firmware upgrade. If you are likely to use one of these ‘cost extras’, don’t be afraid to negotiate with the vendor. It is not unusual for such ‘optional extras’ to be thrown in free of charge to clinch the deal.
A typical scope will offer selectable full scale input ranges from ±50 mV to ±50 V. As higher voltages can be measured using 10:1 and 100:1 attenuating oscilloscope probes, the important thing here is to check that the scope has a small enough voltage range for the signals that you want to measure. If you regularly measure small signals (less than 50 mV), consider buying a scope with a 12 or 16 bit resolution. A 16 bit scope has 256 times the vertical resolution of an 8 bit scope, making it possible to ‘zoom in’ on millivolt and microvolt level signals.
Check that the scope probes you plan to use match—or exceed—the bandwidth of the scope. Some manufacturers make cost savings by supplying substandard probes with the scope and only supply the higher bandwidth probes, which are needed to get the best from the scope, as optional extras. Most scope probes can be switched between 1:1 and 10:1 attenuation. Wherever possible, use the 10:1 setting as this minimises loading on the circuit under test and increases the overload protection should you accidentally connect to a high voltage.
For very high speed signals (> 200 MHz), passive probes begin to run into problems caused by the capacitance of the cable going back to the scope. This can be solved by investing in an active FET probe which places a buffer amplifier in the probe tip. For measuring high voltages, for example ±100 V, mains and 3 phase voltages, the safest option is to use a differential isolating oscilloscope probe.
DSOs broadly fall into three categories: traditional benchtop, handheld, and PC-based.
A purpose built benchtop digital scope will usually have the highest performance, and that will be reflected in the cost. Features such as FFT spectrum analysis, PC interfaces, disk drives and printers all tend to be expensive optional extras.
Hand–held oscilloscopes have obvious advantages for an engineer on the move, but beware of poor displays (difficult to read in sunlight) and short battery life. For a given performance level they also tend to be the most expensive option.
PC-based oscilloscopes are growing in popularity as they offer a considerable cost saving over their benchtop equivalents. The reason for the cost saving is obvious; by using the mass produced PC already sitting on your desk, you end up with a large colour display, fast processor, disk drives and keyboard effectively for free. The ability to export data to wordprocessors and spreadsheets with a couple of mouse clicks is also a big advantage.
PC-based scopes come in two varieties: external and internal. Internal PC-based scopes usually come in PCI format plug in cards. In theory, these should be the lowest cost option but this does not always prove to be true. The main disadvantage of PC cards is noise—the inside of a PC can be a very noisy electrical environment and some cards do suffer. Another issue is portability; oscilloscopes based on PC cards are tied to being used with one desktop PC.
External PC-based oscilloscopes take the form of a small box that connects to the PC via the USB port. By keeping all the analog electronics outside the PC, the noise problem is avoided. A second advantage of external PC-based scopes is portability—they can be used with either desktop or laptop PCs.
Like the dinosaur, the analog scope has really had its day. The cost and performance arguments have made sure that the DSO is here to stay. It only remains to decide which type to buy.
When choosing between different scopes, check the following:
In summary, and in order of priority, It is Bandwidth, Sampling rate (real-time and/or equivalent-time) and then Memory depth. Note: bandwidth and sampling rate are not upgrade options on most DSOs, so once you’ve paid anything up to $60,000 you are stuck with your choice.