It is currently Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:33 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Would Linux drivers be of use to you?
Yes
No
Not Sure
You may select 1 option

View results
Author Message
 Post subject: Linux software for PicoScope 5000
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:50 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:55 am
Posts: 1
Location: UK
I read this forum with considerable interest. I have been very tempted by the PicoScope 5000. But we went 100% Linux back in May 2007 following a very unsuccessful trial of M$ Vista. (http://opensourcecommunity.org/2007/10/15/vista-woes-may-lead-us-better-things if anyone is interested)

Whilst I will probably attempt installing PicoScope software under WINE (well Codeweavers CrossoverLinux to be more precise), I feel very uncomfortable about purchasing an expensive bit of kit such as the Picoscope, if it lacks native Linux software.

Linux has a very strong following within the scientific and engineering communities. It seems rather astonishing that a product such as the PicoScope 5000, which is aimed at exactly the same communities, does not support Linux.

Just my "2p worth". Best wishes, Garf.

_________________
http://www.garfnet.org.uk | Penguin-powered and full of unixy goodness


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:23 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:56 am
Posts: 1
Like so many of your respondents to this question, I too have migrated to Linux (Ubuntu) for sound technical reasons.

I have tried running the sample program under Linux and it freezes after entering the port number, why doesn't it timeout if it cannot find an ADC attached?

Having asked the question, why is there no 'official' statement as to whether the company intends to accommodate Linux users or not? I find it amazing that this question has been alive since 2005, with no response from the company. So much for customer support!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 3:44 pm
Posts: 1
Working in Windows environment is a pain!

I really love Picoscopes. Give us good scope drivers and API and we will create rocking good applications!
It seems that the API is quite lean and straightforward. Keep it simple and reliable.

Think about the power of a scope in an embedded application that draws sources from an open source signal processing software. Picoscopes could replace those A/D-cards in cases where reliability and bandwidth is the key.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 11:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 388
Hello Dom et al.,

Linux drivers are now available for all of our current products, and may be downloaded from our website (http://www.picotech.com/software.html).

Regards
John


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: is source code for 3224 SDK also available?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:28 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:13 am
Posts: 1
With PicoScope 3224 the test program PS3000con crashes here with

"Floating point exception (core dumped)"

I'd like to fix this so I went to look for the source code. The software development kit (R1.0.0) for the device contains a C file PS3000.c but it starts with

"#include <windows.h>"

so it clearly can't be compiled on non-Windows systems without modications. Are the real source codes that were used to compile /usr/local/lib/libps3000.so available somewhere?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 388
Hello Lindi,

Our Linux expert advises that the problem does not lie in our driver, and suggests that you may wish to try updating your gcc and glib.

Regards
John


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Open source libusb driver. For windows and linux.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:25 am 
Offline
User
User

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:12 am
Posts: 3
I don't want only a linux driver. I want an open source driver based on libusb once that is done you can use the driver in both linux and windows, since the creation of libusb for windows. I really like the PicoScope R6.2.2 but I could live with trying to make my own using gtk and c code.
I think I could wipp up a simple usable environment in a week. The advantage of an open source driver is that it can be recompiled for other hardware architectures like arm processors.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
User
User

Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:30 am
Posts: 3
I second Jeff. Even if I can have the source under an NDA with some way to be able to distribute it with a picoscope and an embedded system I would still consider it.

Open source would however be 1st price. Then I do not have to worry about distribution and I would be able to compile for new/next generations of cpus which is not x86 base.

Hanno

_________________
Hanno


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: thirded
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:48 pm 
Offline
User
User

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 2
Closed source drivers work fine in the windows world but for people to commit to buying and using these loggers under linux an open source driver is essential.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO