|
|
| Author |
Message |
bart User

Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:01 pm Post subject: Question about oversampling |
|
|
When using oversampling, does the ADC 212 take the oversampled readings as close together as possible (333 ns)?
ie, if I set oversampling to 4, and a sampling timebase of 10 (1.36 ms), will the ADC take four readings 333ns apart for each reading and then wait about a millisecond before doing another four for the next reading?
Or does it take four readings at about 0.34 millisec apart?
Hope this makes sense!
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sarah Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Bart
Thank you for your questions.
Using these settings you would get one sample every 1.36 ms, but this would be an average of 4 samples taken at 0.34 ms intervals.
Hope that explains it.
Best Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bart User

Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Sarah, that does clearly answer the question.
I am a bit disappointed with the answer though. Effectively oversampling does nothing but a bit of averaging, that could just as easily be done by the caller.
I think it would be better to take the 'oversampled' samples at the highest frequency. Would this be possible to do through the drivers, or is there a hardware limitation that prevents the ADC 212 doing this?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sarah Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
Thank you for your post.
I don't think it would be possible to do through the drivers. It isn't at present as the function calls do not support it. Instead it would require a re-write of the function in the driver and I do not think this will happen. I don't know if there are any hardware limitations however there could be.
Best Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|