THD Value vs HP FFT Analyzer

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pico Technology Forum Index -> PicoScope R6
Author Message
ServoTech
Active User
Active User


Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Radford, Virginia, USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:48 pm    Post subject: THD Value vs HP FFT Analyzer Reply with quote

Hi PicoTech,
Comparing the 3224 vs a HP 35665A FFT Analyzer, the PicoScope reads approximately 20% lower values. Any thoughts why?
Thank you!
Mike
Confused
Back to top
picojohn
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Mike,

What are the characteristics of the test signal used for your comparison, and what do HP have to say?

Regards
John
Back to top
ServoTech
Active User
Active User


Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Radford, Virginia, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:58 pm    Post subject: THD Value vs HP FFT Analyzer Reply with quote

Hi John,

Thanks for the reply. The waveform is a sine wave; the Back EMF of a Servo Motor. The HP FFT Analyzer reads .24%THD, and a Lab View application agrees exactly with the HP. The PicoScope, however, reads .14% when sampling at the exact fundamental frequency. When the sample frequency is a notch off of the fundamental, the PicoScope reads .19% THD (siginal is 19Hz. PicoScope frequency divisions go in steps of 19, and 21Hz). So, the actual error is 42%.

Also, the program produces an error when I attempt to save the FFT waveform as a .csv file, and crashes. The .psdata file saves OK, and the .csv file in scope function saves OK. I am using the new 6_r6_0_13 software.

Thanks for your help!

Regards,
Mike
Back to top
ServoTech
Active User
Active User


Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Radford, Virginia, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm    Post subject: THD Value vs HP FFT Analyzer Reply with quote

Hi John,

On another motor, this one with a poor quality Back EMF waveform, the PicoScope again reads 41% lower value compared to both the HP Analyzer and the Lab View program. The HP and Lab View program both read 5.3% THD, and the PicoScope reads 3.1%. When sampling at a frequency inbetween sample points, the PicoScope reads 5.2% THD.

Best regards,
Mike
Back to top
picojohn
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Mike,

Could you attach a copy of the .psdata files for the measurements in question please, so that we may take a look?

Regards
John
Back to top
ServoTech
Active User
Active User


Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Radford, Virginia, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:25 pm    Post subject: THD Value vs HP FFT Analyzer Reply with quote

Hi John,
When I try to add an attachment, I get an error saying that the .psdata file extension is not allowed. Do you have personal e-mail that I can send to?
Thank you for your help!
Best regards,
Mike
Back to top
picojohn
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Mike,

Please send the file to support@picotech.com for my attention.

Regards
John
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pico Technology Forum Index -> PicoScope R6
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Pico Technology topic RSS feed 
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group